Should book reviews be detailed or concise?
I've recently started to write very short book reviews rather than my standard length (around 500 words) ones.
I think it's a good thing to do, both from a writer's and a reader's point of view but, to coin a phrase, the jury is still out.
I have written an article to explain why I have changed my book review style:
The value of thumbnail book reviews
I hope you will take the time to read it (2 minutes), and that you enjoy it.